It is entirely contrary to decorum to grow overexcited
when you play. Still, you should not play in a careless manner nor lose
deliberately as a way of flattering your opponent. This would make the person
with whom you are playing think that you care little about contributing to his
enjoyment in a well-played match.[1]
- St. John Baptist de La Salle
And so we come to Super Bowl Sunday, the closest thing that
we have to a national ritual expression of our deep devotion to sports. Whether
football fans or not, there are over 100,000,000 of us who tune in to cheer on
our favorite teams, consume our favorite snacks, sit and argue the merits of
players and plays with our favorite people, and generally settle into a
comfortable afternoon as relaxing as that of the players is intensely active
and professionally anxious. (Winners earn over $100K and a $35K ring.)
De La Salle
understood the dynamics and positive aspects of sports and games. He wrote
about the sorts of games that inner-city boys in 17th century France
knew and loved outside of school . . . and sometimes during school. Here are
some examples taken from the book he wrote on politeness, a book that was used
as a reading textbook in his schools, so that these 10-to-13-year-old boys
would learn something useful along with their reading skill.
- “You can play many different kinds of games. Some exercise the mind more; others afford more exercise to the body.”
- Games of chance “are not only forbidden by God’s law, but they are not even permitted by the rules of decorum. Consider them unworthy of an educated person.”
- “It is very impolite for you to make fun of a player who has shown a lack of skill.”
- “There are two passions that you must particularly guard against, so that you do not yield to them when playing games. The first is avarice, and this is ordinarily the source of the second, impatience and fits of anger.”
A section of the Conduct of Schools (1720) lists, with
real insight, six ways that a teacher can be unbearable to students.[2]
Notice that it talks about teachers being unbearable, not students.
With a few slight changes, here is how that section might be applied to coaches
and sports.
- First, the coach's corrections are too rigorous and the yoke which the coach imposes upon the athletes is too heavy. This state of affairs is frequently due to lack of discretion and judgment on the part of the coach. It often happens that athletes do not have enough strength of body or of mind to bear the burdens which many times overwhelm them.
- Second, when the coach enjoins, commands, or demands something of the athletes with words too harsh and in a manner too domineering. Above all, the coach's conduct is unbearable when it arises from unrestrained impatience or anger.
- Third, when the coach is too insistent in urging upon an athlete some performance which the athlete is not disposed to do, and the coach does not permit the athlete the leisure or the time to reflect.
- Fourth, when the coach demands little things and big things alike with the same passion.
- Fifth, when the coach immediately rejects the reasons and excuses of athletes and is not willing to listen to them at all.
- Sixth, when the coach is not mindful enough of personal faults that he [or she] does not know how to sympathize with the weaknesses of athletes and so exaggerates their faults too much. This is the situation when the coach reprimands them or punishes them and acts as though dealing with an insensible instrument rather than with a creature capable of reason.
[2] There is also a section that
lists six ways that a teacher’s (coach’s) weakness leads to laxity, but there
is not enough space in this reflection to list them. Worth looking up, however,
in The Conduct of the Christian Schools
(2007) – Pages 135-137.