Today's activities were very diverse in content, engagement, and character. What started out as a rather quiet, semi-predictable, due process day gradually became rather noisy, unpredictable, and celebratory.
Each morning, we gather for prayer in the main sanctuary, which usually includes a welcome long period of meditation. There is something quietly profound about sitting together in prayer for 20+ minutes with those that you interact with for the rest of the day. It affirms De La Salle's stipulation that interior prayer is the first and most important exercise of the day.
After breakfast, the Paths of Transformation groups met for up to 90 minutes in order to finalize changes to their "Commitments" and other statements, since these would be presented to the assembly starting today. The capitulants would discuss and approve them (2/3 majority required). Our group's six original commitments became four commitments. One was subsumed into another, and one was moved to one of the other groups, since they had a similar commitment. The rest of the time we worked on simplifying the language of the remaining four. We had been advised by Sr. Leslie that "Less is more" and we followed that advise.
At 10:30 am, the capitulants met in the Aula Magna. Before beginning our work, the Communications Office informed the assembly that they would not be filming the election of the Superior General on Wednesday, as had previously been requested and approved with an over 50% vote, but with 26 people opposed. They would instead follow the protocols that are stipulated in the Manual of Procedures (some photos to be taken at the very beginning of the process). It was a wise decision and likely due to further discussion, feedback, and conversations with the central committee.
Next came the consideration of the statements and commitments of the six groups. Altogether, there would be over 30 commitments (seen and handled as "propositions" however) to listen to, consider, amend, and pass. Some took much longer than others, with Brothers proposing amendments or changes or questions of clarification about individual words or phrases. It was all rather arduous but also seen as necessary. Each group had adopted a name or title for its presentation. Group 1 was "Building a Fraternal World through Education, Evangelization and Promotion of Justice" and Group 2 was "The Pathway of Radical Availability to God." After an hour and 45 minutes, we stopped, having completed the consideration of 1.5 groups out of the six. This will take a while. The session ended with a straw vote for future members of the central government, with voting capitulants choosing three from a list of 35 names nominated - even if only by one person. These 35 were what remained after others had removed their names from consideration.
Work on the commitments resumed at 3:00 pm, but at a very slow pace. One person made an intervention decrying the fact that we had been urged to imagine and follow new pathways and processes but that we had devolved into the practice from previous chapters, minutely considering, amending, and voting on what amounted to "propositions". Polite silence ... then "Okay, let's move on." It is very difficult for a roomful of educational administrators from vastly different cultural backgrounds to leave their administrative comfort zone and its habits, despite declarations and good intentions to the contrary. It would be like asking the group to suddently walk on their hands; possible with training, practice, and determination, but unlikely otherwise.
It took another 45 minutes to finish the remaining commitments from Group 2. Then it was the turn of Group 3, which had the simple title of "Revised Structures", but had radically revised its original submission from last week, introducing two new very detailed commitments and retaining edited versions of three of their original ones. It was by far the most detailed and lengthy production among all the groups. It was quickly decided that we needed more time to read and consider this set, and it would therefore become the last set that we will deal with, after all the other groups. Having read through it, my guess is that we will probably need several sessions to adequately consider its commitments.
Group 4, "Integral Ecological Conversion", had five commitments and some helpful initial statements that placed this new category within the context of our mission and ministry. Caring for our common home, defending human dignity, and the protection of minors so that Lasallian institutions would be safe places were some of the areas addressed. There were several suggestions for improvements that were best dealt with by the committee itself, and so some from this set will come back to the floor later on.